Nursing Home Staffing Requirement Changes During the Pandemic
By: Emma Childress
After decades of allowing states to regulate nursing home facilities, the Biden Administration is now taking steps to reform the industry. In the State of the Union Address (Feb. 2022), the Biden Administration announced plans to establish a
Although current federal regulations require nursing home facilities to have 鈥�,鈥� there has never been a federally required minimum number of staffing hours per resident per day. Researchers and patient advocates have been calling for a uniform standard for decades and have linked high staffing levels with higher care quality for residents. A recommended a minimum of 4.1 nursing hours per resident per day to prevent harm to residents. Despite the recommendation, it has been left to the states to regulate staffing in nursing homes creating significant variation across the country.
Over the last few years, COVID-19 has exacerbated the staffing issues found in nursing homes. More than and staff have died from COVID-19 during the pandemic and one in four nursing homes reported a shortage of at least one type of staff.
In response to the staffing crisis in nursing home facilities, I was hired by The Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) to research and coauthor the issue brief, , to highlight different ways states were attempting to address staffing issues.
Our work began by taking a closer look at each state鈥檚 pre-COVID staffing requirements. A recent highlights the variation in each state's staffing requirements and concluded that 鈥渟taffing standards in almost every state remain severely low.鈥� Further, the report found only the District of Columbia met or exceeded the 4.1 hours per resident per day recommendation from the 2001 CMS study.
Despite the low staffing levels, many states took steps to address the nursing home staffing issues during the pandemic in an effort to improve care. We examined state regulatory and legislative changes and found many states made changes to the staffing standards, worker wages, and worker training requirements. Key takeaways are detailed below.
At least five states (AR, CT, MA, NY, RI) adopted permanent increases to nursing home minimum staffing requirements after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, while at least one state (GA) adopted a permanent decrease. In addition to this, two states (OR, SC) adopted temporary decreases to minimum staffing requirements. Although adopting decreases to the requirement can be seen as moving in the wrong direction in terms of improving patient care, some states reported they made this change in response to from hospitals due to staffing issues.
In an effort to retain and recruit staff, at least four states (CO, IL, MA, NC) adopted laws or regulations that require increases to nursing home staff wages since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. At least three states (MI, NC, OH) adopted temporary increases or one-time bonuses to nursing home staff wages post-COVID. Many of these states sought to increase the minimum wage nursing direct home care staff were paid.
Additionally, at least 3 states (KY, MO, WI) adopted permanent changes to staff training requirements post-COVID to expand the pool of staff available to work in nursing homes, while at least 8 states (AK, CT, DE, IA, IN, KS, MO, WI) adopted temporary changes in this area. This often included lowering the training hour requirements for nursing aides (or CNAs) to help offset staffing shortages.
Since the publication of the issue brief, CMS announced its plans to start using payroll data to ensure nursing homes comply with staffing requirements. While this may be a step towards greater compliance with nursing home staffing requirements or even a precursor for stricter regulation to come, experts worry this may . Either way, this may be a critical step toward improving care in nursing homes.
Researching and responding to a current issue that deeply affects how care can be given was enlightening. My interest quickly grew, and I was able to see a direct and tangible link between regulations and care received. It was an honor to be able to participate in this project, and I hope to continue working to educate others on the issues we face. I believe with knowledge and awareness we can spur great change.
Additionally, I鈥檇 like to thank , KFF鈥檚 Associate Director at the Program on Medicaid and the Uninsured, for her guidance and assistance. It was a privilege to work with her on this project.
Portions of this article originally appeared in the Kaiser Family Foundation brief,